Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2013 December 26: Difference between revisions

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 23: Line 23:
::We disagree. IMO: Failure to notify properly is CERTAINLY an excellent reason to not delete. It's sad that it seems to be common. --[[User:Elvey|Elvey]] ([[User talk:Elvey|talk]]) 20:30, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
::We disagree. IMO: Failure to notify properly is CERTAINLY an excellent reason to not delete. It's sad that it seems to be common. --[[User:Elvey|Elvey]] ([[User talk:Elvey|talk]]) 20:30, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
:::You're right, but finding out the actual nominator, and asking them to fix their mistake would've been a better solution. The main image was tagged correctly, as were the below ones that you claimed weren't. The additional images the nominator listed were not tagged right, so I asked her to fix it. Failure of notification is not reason to keep, but it reason to postpone the discussion until the notification is properly done. So instead of keeping the image just because someone made a mistake, the closing admin would be wise to take that mistake (and the resolution of it) into consideration of ''when'' to close the discussion as opposed to ''how'' to close it. -- [[User:ТимофейЛееСуда|'''Тимофей''']][[User_talk:ТимофейЛееСуда|'''<font color="#00f00ff">ЛееСуда</font>''']]. 20:58, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
:::You're right, but finding out the actual nominator, and asking them to fix their mistake would've been a better solution. The main image was tagged correctly, as were the below ones that you claimed weren't. The additional images the nominator listed were not tagged right, so I asked her to fix it. Failure of notification is not reason to keep, but it reason to postpone the discussion until the notification is properly done. So instead of keeping the image just because someone made a mistake, the closing admin would be wise to take that mistake (and the resolution of it) into consideration of ''when'' to close the discussion as opposed to ''how'' to close it. -- [[User:ТимофейЛееСуда|'''Тимофей''']][[User_talk:ТимофейЛееСуда|'''<font color="#00f00ff">ЛееСуда</font>''']]. 20:58, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
::::The usual thing is to not add any {{tl|pufc}} image. Also, non-addition of that template is not a reason to keep a file. --[[User:Stefan2|Stefan2]] ([[User talk:Stefan2|talk]]) 00:57, 29 December 2013 (UTC)


A thousand pardons. I deliberately nominated only one but listed them all. I thought that otherwise, Twinkle would generate four, separate discussions, each using as a reason for deletion, the other images in the group. Evaluating the images as a group seemed to makes sense. Should I now nominate the other three and cross link them all? [[User:Anna Frodesiak|Anna Frodesiak]] ([[User talk:Anna Frodesiak|talk]]) 22:54, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
A thousand pardons. I deliberately nominated only one but listed them all. I thought that otherwise, Twinkle would generate four, separate discussions, each using as a reason for deletion, the other images in the group. Evaluating the images as a group seemed to makes sense. Should I now nominate the other three and cross link them all? [[User:Anna Frodesiak|Anna Frodesiak]] ([[User talk:Anna Frodesiak|talk]]) 22:54, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
Line 40: Line 41:
*'''Keep''' I see Leoboudv has failed to tag nominations properly. Example: <nowiki> {{Pufc|1=Ryansfancygroup.jpg|date=28 December 2013}}</nowiki> was never added, so I object to the lot of them.--[[User:Elvey|Elvey]] ([[User talk:Elvey|talk]]) 19:23, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' I see Leoboudv has failed to tag nominations properly. Example: <nowiki> {{Pufc|1=Ryansfancygroup.jpg|date=28 December 2013}}</nowiki> was never added, so I object to the lot of them.--[[User:Elvey|Elvey]] ([[User talk:Elvey|talk]]) 19:23, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
*:You're right Leoboudv did not tag this image, because they did not nominate it. Sfan00 IMG did, and he tagged it correctly on 01:42, 26 December 2013‎. Cheers. -- [[User:ТимофейЛееСуда|'''Тимофей''']][[User_talk:ТимофейЛееСуда|'''<font color="#00f00ff">ЛееСуда</font>''']]. 19:39, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
*:You're right Leoboudv did not tag this image, because they did not nominate it. Sfan00 IMG did, and he tagged it correctly on 01:42, 26 December 2013‎. Cheers. -- [[User:ТимофейЛееСуда|'''Тимофей''']][[User_talk:ТимофейЛееСуда|'''<font color="#00f00ff">ЛееСуда</font>''']]. 19:39, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
*::The usual thing is to not add any {{tl|pufc}} image. Also, non-addition of that template is not a reason to keep a file. --[[User:Stefan2|Stefan2]] ([[User talk:Stefan2|talk]]) 00:58, 29 December 2013 (UTC)


====[[:File:Ryansfancygroup.jpg]]====
====[[:File:Ryansfancygroup.jpg]]====
Line 48: Line 50:
::Leoboudv HAS failed to tag nominations properly. L DID do [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Ryansfancygroup.jpg&diff=587703024&oldid=587702883 this]. I see that L is instructed there to "Add the following to the file's caption(s): <nowiki>{{Pufc|1=Ryansfancygroup.jpg|date=28 December 2013}}</nowiki>" but did NOT do so. As I said, "No edit [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ryan%27s_Fancy&action=history here]!" So what I said, "Leoboudv has failed to tag nominations properly. Example: <nowiki>{{Pufc|1=Ryansfancygroup.jpg|date=28 December 2013}}</nowiki> was never added" was true.
::Leoboudv HAS failed to tag nominations properly. L DID do [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Ryansfancygroup.jpg&diff=587703024&oldid=587702883 this]. I see that L is instructed there to "Add the following to the file's caption(s): <nowiki>{{Pufc|1=Ryansfancygroup.jpg|date=28 December 2013}}</nowiki>" but did NOT do so. As I said, "No edit [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ryan%27s_Fancy&action=history here]!" So what I said, "Leoboudv has failed to tag nominations properly. Example: <nowiki>{{Pufc|1=Ryansfancygroup.jpg|date=28 December 2013}}</nowiki> was never added" was true.
::We disagree. IMO: Failure to notify is CERTAINLY a reason to oppose deletion. So is the one you give below. --[[User:Elvey|Elvey]] ([[User talk:Elvey|talk]]) 20:22, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
::We disagree. IMO: Failure to notify is CERTAINLY a reason to oppose deletion. So is the one you give below. --[[User:Elvey|Elvey]] ([[User talk:Elvey|talk]]) 20:22, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
:::The usual thing is to not add any {{tl|pufc}} image. Also, non-addition of that template is not a reason to keep a file. --[[User:Stefan2|Stefan2]] ([[User talk:Stefan2|talk]]) 00:58, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
*'''Keep'''. Change license to Non-free. As a title-card of the television show, it would be allowed per [[WP:NFCI]] and meets the criteria of [[WP:NFCC]]. -- [[User:ТимофейЛееСуда|'''Тимофей''']][[User_talk:ТимофейЛееСуда|'''<font color="#00f00ff">ЛееСуда</font>''']]. 20:11, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
*'''Keep'''. Change license to Non-free. As a title-card of the television show, it would be allowed per [[WP:NFCI]] and meets the criteria of [[WP:NFCC]]. -- [[User:ТимофейЛееСуда|'''Тимофей''']][[User_talk:ТимофейЛееСуда|'''<font color="#00f00ff">ЛееСуда</font>''']]. 20:11, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
*'''Comment''' I did [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jcmurphy&diff=587715162&oldid=587604456 notify] the banned uploader and have now taken this [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Ryansfancygroup.jpg&diff=588117082&oldid=588116984 step] as Elvey requested. As for this image, if the image license is changed to non-free, I would have no objection to keeping this image as long as a non-free rationale is added. It is not the uploader's 'own work.' Thank You, --[[User:Leoboudv|Leoboudv]] ([[User talk:Leoboudv|talk]]) 20:39, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
*'''Comment''' I did [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jcmurphy&diff=587715162&oldid=587604456 notify] the banned uploader and have now taken this [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Ryansfancygroup.jpg&diff=588117082&oldid=588116984 step] as Elvey requested. As for this image, if the image license is changed to non-free, I would have no objection to keeping this image as long as a non-free rationale is added. It is not the uploader's 'own work.' Thank You, --[[User:Leoboudv|Leoboudv]] ([[User talk:Leoboudv|talk]]) 20:39, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:58, 29 December 2013

< December 25 December 27 >

December 26

File:Darj(rh252-4643).jpg

File:Darj(rh252-4643).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • One of four images uploaded by banned User:Mokshanine. Likely copyvios as one has "Courtesy of ..." and another claims to have been drawn by author, but I doubt that.

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:27, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

We disagree. IMO: Failure to notify properly is CERTAINLY an excellent reason to not delete. It's sad that it seems to be common. --Elvey (talk) 20:30, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
You're right, but finding out the actual nominator, and asking them to fix their mistake would've been a better solution. The main image was tagged correctly, as were the below ones that you claimed weren't. The additional images the nominator listed were not tagged right, so I asked her to fix it. Failure of notification is not reason to keep, but it reason to postpone the discussion until the notification is properly done. So instead of keeping the image just because someone made a mistake, the closing admin would be wise to take that mistake (and the resolution of it) into consideration of when to close the discussion as opposed to how to close it. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 20:58, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The usual thing is to not add any {{pufc}} image. Also, non-addition of that template is not a reason to keep a file. --Stefan2 (talk) 00:57, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A thousand pardons. I deliberately nominated only one but listed them all. I thought that otherwise, Twinkle would generate four, separate discussions, each using as a reason for deletion, the other images in the group. Evaluating the images as a group seemed to makes sense. Should I now nominate the other three and cross link them all? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 22:54, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, okay. I get it now. The template's "...this file's listing..." goes to Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2013 December 26 and not this exact entry. I've tagged the rest and will know for next time. Sorry for the trouble. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:03, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Beanie babies sock money 1.jpg

File:Beanie babies sock money 1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:Musical Landscapes and the Goddesses of Music.JPG

File:Musical Landscapes and the Goddesses of Music.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • This is a sculpture. Does FoP apply? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:42, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: I suppose FOP would depend on which country this sculpture is located in. If it is located in India, Vietnam, China or Malaysia which has FOP for 3D works, it might be OK. If it was in Cambodia or Laos, it might not be OK. Only an Admin would know, however. --Leoboudv (talk) 04:41, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Unknown country, so impossible to tell whether FOP applies or not. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:26, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep I see Leoboudv has failed to tag nominations properly. Example: {{Pufc|1=Ryansfancygroup.jpg|date=28 December 2013}} was never added, so I object to the lot of them.--Elvey (talk) 19:23, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    You're right Leoboudv did not tag this image, because they did not nominate it. Sfan00 IMG did, and he tagged it correctly on 01:42, 26 December 2013‎. Cheers. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 19:39, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    The usual thing is to not add any {{pufc}} image. Also, non-addition of that template is not a reason to keep a file. --Stefan2 (talk) 00:58, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ryansfancygroup.jpg

File:Ryansfancygroup.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • This image was uploaded by a user who was banned for uploading copyright violations and typing in fake OTRS permission tickets as well as impersonating another user. How can he/she claim to freely license this image as 'own work' when it appears to be a non-free fair use image? We don't know the source of this photo so it may be safer to delete it on the precautionary principle. Leoboudv (talk) 05:08, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep I see Leoboudv has failed to tag nominations properly. Example: {{Pufc|1=Ryansfancygroup.jpg|date=28 December 2013}} was never added, so I object to the lot of them.--Elvey (talk) 19:23, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    Actually Leoboudv did tag this one correctly on 05:04, 26 December 2013. Cheers. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 19:38, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Leoboudv HAS failed to tag nominations properly. L DID do this. I see that L is instructed there to "Add the following to the file's caption(s): {{Pufc|1=Ryansfancygroup.jpg|date=28 December 2013}}" but did NOT do so. As I said, "No edit here!" So what I said, "Leoboudv has failed to tag nominations properly. Example: {{Pufc|1=Ryansfancygroup.jpg|date=28 December 2013}} was never added" was true.
We disagree. IMO: Failure to notify is CERTAINLY a reason to oppose deletion. So is the one you give below. --Elvey (talk) 20:22, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The usual thing is to not add any {{pufc}} image. Also, non-addition of that template is not a reason to keep a file. --Stefan2 (talk) 00:58, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Change license to Non-free. As a title-card of the television show, it would be allowed per WP:NFCI and meets the criteria of WP:NFCC. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 20:11, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I did notify the banned uploader and have now taken this step as Elvey requested. As for this image, if the image license is changed to non-free, I would have no objection to keeping this image as long as a non-free rationale is added. It is not the uploader's 'own work.' Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:39, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sheikh Mubarak Abdulllah Al-Jaber Al-Sabah.jpg

File:Sheikh Mubarak Abdulllah Al-Jaber Al-Sabah.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:Mubarak Abdullah Al-Jaber Al-Sabah.jpg

File:Mubarak Abdullah Al-Jaber Al-Sabah.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Presents the same problems as :File:Sheikh Mubarack Abdullah Al-Jaber Al-Sabah.jpg, from which this image has been cropped. It is highly doubtful that the uploader is the copyright holder, as is claimed. No detailed source, author or date information has been provided, which makes it difficult to determine the copyright status of the original. A photograph taken in the 1960s is unlikely to have yet entered the public domain according to the rules of most countries. SuperMarioMan 05:48, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Beanie babies sock monkey 2.jpg

File:Beanie babies sock monkey 2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:TempHeatWater.jpg

File:TempHeatWater.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Possible textbook image, Uploader is aware of this issue. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:32, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Earthfeature12.jpg

File:Earthfeature12.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Possible textbook image, Uploader is aware of this issue. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:32, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:PlantresidueChangewithAge.jpg

File:PlantresidueChangewithAge.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Possible textbook image, Uploader is aware of this issue. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:32, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Soildegradation.jpg

File:Soildegradation.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Possible textbook image, Uploader is aware of this issue. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:32, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:MatricPotentialvshydro.jpg

File:MatricPotentialvshydro.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Possible textbook image, Uploader is aware of this issue. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:33, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:SoilPhosphorus.jpg

File:SoilPhosphorus.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Possible textbook image, Uploader is aware of this issue. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:33, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:EffectiveCECsoilpH.jpg

File:EffectiveCECsoilpH.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Possible textbook image, Uploader is aware of this issue. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:34, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:SoilDepo.jpg

File:SoilDepo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Possible textbook image, Uploader is aware of this issue. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:34, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Somatosensory cortex map.jpg

File:Somatosensory cortex map.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Possible textbook image, Uploader is aware of this issue. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:34, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:SoilStructurepotential.jpg

File:SoilStructurepotential.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Possible textbook image, Uploader is aware of this issue. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:35, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Range of SoilpH.jpg

File:Range of SoilpH.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Possible textbook image, Uploader is aware of this issue. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:35, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Soil water potential 2.jpg

File:Soil water potential 2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Possible textbook image, Uploader is aware of this issue. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:36, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:PlantResidueComponents.jpg

File:PlantResidueComponents.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Possible textbook image, Uploader is aware of this issue. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:37, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shiwan Ware figures.jpg

File:Shiwan Ware figures.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Editor did not leave a direct source (might be uploader's own work) but left "fair use" in the description. Also, unknown statues may have copyright of their own. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 22:22, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_files/2013_December_26&oldid=588144297"