User talk:Greta Munger: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎sandbox draft: new section
Line 13: Line 13:


You can name your userspace subpages however you like.--[[User:Sross (Public Policy)|Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation]] ([[User talk:Sross (Public Policy)|talk]]) 14:49, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
You can name your userspace subpages however you like.--[[User:Sross (Public Policy)|Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation]] ([[User talk:Sross (Public Policy)|talk]]) 14:49, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

== sandbox draft ==

Hey! Your draft is looking great! I wouldn't worry about waiting for feedback; now is the time to move it into mainspace and nominate it for DYK. After that (immediately after, if you're pretty happy with it yourself and think it's a well-rounded account of representational momentum) the next step could be nominating it for Good Article status; let me know when you do that, and I'll find someone to review it in a timely manner.--[[User:Sross (Public Policy)|Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation]] ([[User talk:Sross (Public Policy)|talk]]) 17:32, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:32, 7 July 2011

Hi Greta! Welcome to Wikipedia.--Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 15:11, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of coffee for you!

Hi again Greta! I see you've made it most of the way through the course page wizard. Now just create the tabs, beginning with the discussion tab, and you'll be ready to go! Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 19:16, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sandbox naming, and your course page

Hi again! Those bugs with the tabs on your course page were a MediaWiki caching issue; they should appear correctly for you now.

You can name your userspace subpages however you like.--Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 14:49, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

sandbox draft

Hey! Your draft is looking great! I wouldn't worry about waiting for feedback; now is the time to move it into mainspace and nominate it for DYK. After that (immediately after, if you're pretty happy with it yourself and think it's a well-rounded account of representational momentum) the next step could be nominating it for Good Article status; let me know when you do that, and I'll find someone to review it in a timely manner.--Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 17:32, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]