I see ChzzBot II regularly patrolling [[Wikipedia:Sandbox]], but not its associated talkpage. That talkpage is itself a sandbox, not "talkpage about the sandbox", and could use a periodic cleanup. Probably 12hr or longer would be sufficient. [[User:DMacks|DMacks]] ([[User talk:DMacks|talk]]) 17:33, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
:Yep; I'm aware that the talks of various sandboxes should also be cleared; I knew it when I wrote the bots, a few months back. And, some other pages need clearing. I will do my best to add these things to the bot's repetoire ASAP. Cheers, <small><span style="border:1px solid;background:#00008B">[[User:Chzz|'''<span style="background:#00008B;color:white"> Chzz </span>''']][[User talk:Chzz|<span style="color:#00008B;background-color:yellow;"> ► </span>]]</span></small> 04:54, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Since we weren't able to bring you to any pubs when you were here, I guess this will have to do. It was nice seeing you last weekend and I hope to see you again next year! [[User:Ktr101|Kevin Rutherford]] ([[User_talk:Ktr101|talk]]) 02:09, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
|}
Revision as of 02:09, 15 July 2011
I'm in Boston until 15 July, so replies might be delayed...
This user account is a botoperated by Chzz (talk).It is used to make repetitive automated or semi-automated edits that would be extremely tedious to do manually, in accordance with the bot policy. This bot does not yet have the approval of the community, or approval has been withdrawn or expired, and therefore shouldn't be making edits that appear to be unassisted except in the operator's or its own user and user talk space. Administrators: if this bot is making edits that appear to be unassisted to pages not in the operator's or its own userspace, please block it.
This discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
If it appears to be a submission - ie, it contains "{{afc submission") and the page name begins with "Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/", and doesn't contain "template:", and
If the page has no references at all (ie no "<ref" case-insensitive), or "{{harv" or "{{sfn" and
If it's not a disambig - ie doesn't contain "{disamb") or "{{dab" or "{{dbig" or the title contains "disambig",, and the AFC is not in a category containing "disambig" (e.g. {{geodis}}THEN
IF the creator has no user talk page at all, it adds a short 'welcome' -
– Article already accepted. mabdul 12:32, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Dear ChzzBot IV,
I received your message that I need inline references in the "Patrick E. McGovern" article. But the original submission included numerous inline refs., which now have been deleted. How do I get back to the original version?
Hi, this is Dodobird1982. You told me I need references but what if you learn something through a personal experience. In this case, I watched Dragon Ball Z, and that is how I know about the character Nail. Please respond as soon as you can! Thanks! Dodobird1982 (talk) 20:36, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Dodobird1982,
this is not how Wikipedia works. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and thus your submission falls likely in the category which is not covered by Wikipedia. Please read WP:NOT and consider searching at Wikia for the Dragon Ball wiki. Regards, mabdul 12:38, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
A kitten for you!
Thank you very much chzzbot for the review of my article and your guidance to improve it.
So, in this article (which was denied by you as unverified)I added all improtant information, including supported by reliable sources. 3 times I was tried to make this article affirmed, but even after I added reliable and verifed sources, it's still was denied to be article. Is this homophoby or what?? And if my sources are not verifed, which you can call verifed sourses then??
Please respond me here, thanks in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.70.15.114 (talk) 17:01, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The High Quality Transport Refrigeration Parts
Hi,
Recently i had purchased transport refrigeration parts from a site www.thermoenginesupply.com.The thermo king parts are of high quality and at affordable price.
THERMO ENGINE SUPPLY is a leader in quality replacement parts for Thermo King transport refrigeration units.
High-quality replacement parts for Thermo King transport refrigeration units and equipment.
Thermo Engine Supply offers a comprehensive line of fast-moving parts for your Thermo King, transport refrigeration unit maintenance and service needs.
we can purchase thermo king compressors,thermo king alternators,thermo king pumps and thermo king belts also. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thermoenginesupply (talk • contribs) 13:28, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Just in case you ever restart this
User:ChzzBot IV/AFC unreferenced is wrong. You need to completely re-code this if you ever try to run it again. The use of <ref> tags is absolutely not required, and you should not be telling users that their AFC submissions don't include WP:Inline citations merely because they don't use ref tags. WhatamIdoing (talk) 15:54, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The Reference Links have been updated in the Article. And Links are made with proper attention. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ravinder3790 (talk • contribs) 10:47, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Riddle me this
I've been trying to pick up the strings of where the "proposal to require autoconfirmed status in order to create articles" left off. I know there was consensus, and some talk of a trial, but has there been any recent forward movement? As one of the clear supporters, I'm hoping you may have some insight. Cheers, --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 13:58, 6 July 2011 (UTC),[reply]
Unfortunately User:Rd232 has taken an indefinite leave from Wikipedia; hopefully this entire process won't stall as a result. --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 14:08, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The VPP proposal has been open well over 30 days, with overwhelming support - only a couple of minor opposes, and all they're debating is whether it should be 3 months or 6 months initially - which, really, doesn't matter - anything can be switched on/off, if there's an issue. So....yeah; I think that proposal could be closed, and we could ask the devs to 'make it so'. Probably an announcement on AN would be a good idea, and maybe ask there for someone uninvolved to close the proposal discussion.
I can't see any reason to delay implementation, to be honest. *Anyone* - you, me, etc - could get it moving; consensus is clear enough. Chzz ► 16:27, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
hi!
Hi - I met you at the summit this weekend, and am just leaving comments on talk for everyone I met for future communication. Kevin (talk) 17:20, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Replied on user talk Chzz ► 18:01, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Chzz'y! Thanks for being part of a great few days in Boston! Hope you enjoy the rest of your time there. Do try to not get carded again, okay? ;-) Ed[talk][majestic titan] 08:50, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Chzz. You have new messages at The ed17's talk page. Message added 15:51, 11 July 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]
Hello Chzz,
I wanted to say "hello" and let you know that I noticed that, whenever you spoke in Boston (at least when I was present), something interesting and perceptive and thoughtful and provocative emerged. It was a pleasure to meet you, and I look forward to collaborating with you, with the goal of making this a better encyclopedia. I see that you are spending some extra time in Boston. We expect several articles about baked beans and the Red Sox. Cullen328 (talk) 02:33, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hi; thanks! I'm having fun in Boston! Too much, probably; I've made friends with Mr. Samuel Adams...hence...not so coherent. I'll be back in UK tomorrow, after which, 'normal service' will be resumed. More or less. Cheers! Chzz ► 04:52, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I see ChzzBot II regularly patrolling Wikipedia:Sandbox, but not its associated talkpage. That talkpage is itself a sandbox, not "talkpage about the sandbox", and could use a periodic cleanup. Probably 12hr or longer would be sufficient. DMacks (talk) 17:33, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yep; I'm aware that the talks of various sandboxes should also be cleared; I knew it when I wrote the bots, a few months back. And, some other pages need clearing. I will do my best to add these things to the bot's repetoire ASAP. Cheers, Chzz ► 04:54, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
A beer for you!
Since we weren't able to bring you to any pubs when you were here, I guess this will have to do. It was nice seeing you last weekend and I hope to see you again next year! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 02:09, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]