Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baron Mulingar: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m fix
Line 2: Line 2:
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}}
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}}


:{{la|Earl of Carbery}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baron Mulingar|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2010 February 25#{{anchorencode:Baron Mulingar}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baron Mulingar}}|2=AfD statistics}})
:{{la|Baron Mulingar}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baron Mulingar|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2010 February 25#{{anchorencode:Baron Mulingar}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baron Mulingar}}|2=AfD statistics}})
:({{findsources|Baron Mulingar}})
:({{findsources|Baron Mulingar}})
This appears to be a genealogy but I can't see how the family is notable independent of a few members who have Wikipedia articles. &mdash;<span style="color:#808080">[[User:Kuyabribri|'''KuyaBriBri''']]</span><sup><span style="color:#008080">[[User_Talk:Kuyabribri|''Talk'']]</span></sup> 15:19, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
This appears to be a genealogy but I can't see how the family is notable independent of a few members who have Wikipedia articles. &mdash;<span style="color:#808080">[[User:Kuyabribri|'''KuyaBriBri''']]</span><sup><span style="color:#008080">[[User_Talk:Kuyabribri|''Talk'']]</span></sup> 15:19, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:18, 3 March 2010

Baron Mulingar

Baron Mulingar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This appears to be a genealogy but I can't see how the family is notable independent of a few members who have Wikipedia articles. —KuyaBriBriTalk 15:19, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. All are notable as members of the (defunct) Irish House of Lords or United Kingdom House of Lords. Eastmain (talkcontribs) 16:49, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as per Eastmain.Edward321 (talk) 02:33, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete and redirect to Earl of Carbery, entire content of the article is not about the Peerage title of Baron of Mulingar. Content contains duplicate content to the article Viscount Gormanston & Gormanston, County Meath (looks like a cut and paste), a slective genealogy of the Preston family (family head is the holder of the Peerage title of Gormanston) and a description of the Gormanston Arms. No link is shown or asserted between the title of Viscount Gormanston nor the Preston family to the title Baron Mulingar. --blue520 04:06, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Seems to satisfy all criteria, to the point and referenced. (Historyislife (talk) 10:41, 1 March 2010 (UTC))[reply]
  • Keep I agree and concur.(Leeadam68 (talk) 10:45, 1 March 2010 (UTC))[reply]
  • Keep There seems to have been a non-issue here raised by perhaps non-experts in the field. artical should stand as is. Irishlibraryguy (talk) 13:09, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]