User talk:J Greb: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 19:59, 2 July 2011

J Greb is busy and is going to be on Wikipedia in off-and-on doses, and may not respond swiftly to queries.

This talk page is automatically archived by Miszabot. Any sections older than 10 days are automatically archived to User talk:J Greb/Archive Apr 2024. Sections without timestamps are not archived.

Scope for Spider-Man: Big Time

For the new article I created we need to have a discussion about how big the scope of the article is going to be. I started the article trying to mimic the Spider-Man: Brand New Day article, but recent edits by other uses are changing the article away from that. We need to establish a consensus for the scope of this article so there are no edit wars and so the article can be concise and a quality article. Please post an opinion to the article's talk page where I have further elaborated on my point of view. Thank you. Spidey104 16:35, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Star Sapphire power ring.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Star Sapphire power ring.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:33, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Orange Lantern power ring.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Orange Lantern power ring.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:43, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Star Sapphire power ring.jpg 2nd pass

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We always appreciate when users upload new images. However, it appears that one or more of the images you have recently uploaded or added to an article may fail our non-free image policy. Most often, this involves editors uploading or using a copyrighted image of a living person. For other possible reasons, please read up on our non-free image criteria. Please note that we take very seriously our criteria on non-free image uploads, and users who repeatedly upload or misuse non-free images may be blocked from editing. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media Copyright Questions page. ΔT _{^{The only constant}} 14:14, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Um

Your comments are not very civil. Where do you think consensus on a topic like this is supposed to be developed? This relates to an ArbCom decision. --Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 21:03, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Have brought my concerns regarding your behavior here. As feedback this sort of bittyness is not good for the project. Cheers Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 21:31, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Breen (Star Trek)

Regarding sourcing, since when is sourcing relevant for images? Are you saying that WP:IRS applies to images? Why is this? Nightscream (talk) 20:13, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Btw, I've reported Triangle at the Edit Warring Noticeboard. The point that Triangle acts as if we're supposed to read his mind, and know which criterion is wrong out all those on those image policy pages he links to, which is a point you yourself made to him, is noted. I pointed this out at the Noticeboard, so your participation would be appreciated, because this guy obviously is incapable of admitting that he's wrong, or that he knew he could've fixed the rationale or explained to me what was wrong with it, and refused to do so., so that he could carry on a personal grudge with me. Nightscream (talk) 21:56, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See the following:

- J Greb (talk) 22:03, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Supergirl v1 1.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Supergirl v1 1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:22, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Character set indexes

It' all clear, but I still have a doubt In Captain Marvel (Marvel Comics) page, you reverted my edits about writers and artist; The template used Comics set and title does include fields for creators who have contributed to the series. And that was what I did. What was wrong? Fma12 (talk) 01:17, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That's the laundry list effect. Realistically we aren't indexing the issues, adding all the writers or pencillers for a volume begs for the issues they handled to listed.

For the writers there, I can see an argument for vol 2 through 5 since each series had a single writer. Same for the One shots - and yes, for completeness the should be there.

Same for the writers for vol 2, 3, and 5 - 1 penciller through out.

But when you start list 3+ people, is it because their individual runs are notable or because the list needs to be complete? If the runs are notable then there should be something in the article about that. Something with sources that support it as notable.

- J Greb (talk) 02:40, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Marvel Comics images

I removed Category:Marvel comic book covers and Category:Marvel Comics covers from the category "Marvel Comics images", because all of the other subcategories there deal with images, not with covers. The category header even states that it "does not include cover art presented without titles, logos, trade dress, or copy", yet it is listed under a category that does include those images. Besides, both of these categories are already listed as subcategories of Category:Comic book covers. Why should they be listed in both places, when none of the other categories that deal with covers are listed under Category:Marvel Comics images? Fortdj33 (talk) 11:24, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK... look at the full headers of both parent an sub cats:

"This category collects images that are scans, screen captures, photos, and/or illustrations of characters and related intellectual properties for which Marvel Comics holds the copyright and/or trademark."

and

"This category collects cover images that are scans, in whole or in part, as published by Marvel Comics. This includes material either owned at the time by Marvel or licensed from other companies. This does not include cover art presented without titles, logos, trade dress, or copy."

The former includes everything we are likely to have a file/image of and that is a Marvel property/product. That includes scans of covers.

The latter is more specific to avoid cover art only getting added to the category but it still contains images that fall under the parent category.

- J Greb (talk) 17:06, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think I understand, thank you for clarifying. I'm not trying to cause any problems, I just want to do my part in cleaning up some of the redundancy, with the files that are part of WikiProject Comics. Let me know if there's anything more that I can do. Fortdj33 (talk) 19:13, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:LSH images

Category:LSH images, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 08:00, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Covers from titles related to LSH

Category:Covers from titles related to LSH, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 08:01, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Covers from titles related to JLA

Category:Covers from titles related to JLA, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 08:01, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:JLA images

Category:JLA images, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 08:02, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:JLU screenshots and pictures

Category:JLU screenshots and pictures, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 08:03, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:JSA images

Category:JSA images, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 08:04, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Covers from titles related to JSA

Category:Covers from titles related to JSA, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 08:04, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Covers from titles related to New Gods

Category:Covers from titles related to New Gods, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 08:05, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A brownie for you!

Just for cautious reasons and respect. I hope you don't treat my different opinions the wrong way. I know you (and I) are user's that try to resolve differences. Jhenderson⁷⁷⁷ 19:59, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 127: / Line 127: @@
 '''[[:Category:Covers from titles related to New Gods]]''', which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at '''[[Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2011 July 2#Category:Covers from titles related to New Gods|the category's entry]]''' on the [[Wikipedia:Categories for discussion|Categories for discussion]] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. [[User:Mike Selinker|Mike Selinker]] ([[User talk:Mike Selinker|talk]]) 08:05, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
+== A brownie for you! ==
+{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
+|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | [[File:Brownie transparent.png|120px]]
+|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Just for cautious reasons and respect. I hope you don't treat my different opinions the wrong way. I know you (and I) are user's that try to resolve differences. [[User:Jhenderson777|<span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px:color:blue">Jhenderson</span>]]<sup>'''[[User talk:Jhenderson777| <span style="color:red;">7</span><span style="color:blue;">7</span><span style="color:aqua;">7</span>]]'''</sup> 19:59, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
+|}